I find this information very interseting! If you haven’t stumbled upon this VERY RECENT U. S. Census data – take some time to poke around and ponder the current situations and the trends. Happy thinking!!!!
Embed on your site:
Data provided by U.S. Census Bureau.
Population Density: Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia in population density rankings, 1 to 52.
Apportionment: Apportionment is the process of dividing the 435 seats in the House of Representatives among the 50 states. Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia are not included.
Alaska and Hawaii gained statehood in 1959. Arizona and New Mexico gained statehood in 1912. For apportionment, data before those periods are not reflected on the map.
Congress did not reapportion in 1920. Therefore, the apportionment data shown for this decade replicates the data for 1910. There is no data reflected for the apportionment population in the 1920 “people per representative” chart.
This time of year is a great time for me.I tend to really cut back on the ‘number of things on my plate’ during this week and attempt to explore a new idea or two.
One of those new ideas I am exploring, during this relaxing week, is the concept of how does one prepare to help individual adults who say they want to experience deep change in an area of their choosing.Intentionally tackling a growth edge while in the midst of life’s journeys is by no means simple or easy.And to find an approach to tackling that change that will both connect with and serve busy, responsible adults is challenging.
Immunity to Change: How To Overcome It And Unlock Potential In Yourself And Your Organization by Kegan and Lahey (2009) is proving to be very helpful.Obviously, many scholars and practitioners have tackled this issue. Kegan and Lahey make a lot of sense.There approach is not simple but it is clear and understandable.Thus, I continue to read and think about their work and how I might help others apply the their approach.When it comes to thinking about individuals and groups intentionally embarking on a journey of significant; this is a stimulating read!
They wish their readers “big leaps and safe landings!” page 323
When we are looking to the future and seeing the possibility of change.We have to face the weight of the ‘status quo’.Generally individuals or groups of people in families, classrooms, businesses and organizations find the current practices to be difficult to move away from.Not impossible, but difficult.A transition needs to take place.
William Bridges writes about transitions and change.He explains that we have to be willing to move into ‘new beginnings’.“Transition starts with an ending – paradoxical but true.The starting point for transition is not the outcome but the ending that you will have to make to leave the old situation behind.Situational change hinges on the new thing, but psychological transition depends on letting go of the old reality and the old identity you had before the change took place.” ~ W Bridges, Managing Transitions (1991, 2005 and 2009)
The lesson to learn is that ‘letting go’ (allowing for an ending) of the status quo is not an automatic occurrence for people. It is a process and the process may not be swift or smooth.Yet, without that transition through the ‘space’ between the status quo and the new beginning – it is not likely that you or the group will really achieve grounded change.
Helping to bring about transformative change for our communities and for our children is both hard and possible. It will likely be both exhilarating and discouraging.
It is important, timely and worth doing. If not you, who?
“Practice both optimism and realism. Some people would have you choose one or the other. Believing in one or both is a choice. By holding on to the both, by being unwaveringly optimistic and coolly realistic at the same time, you keep that optimism from floating off into naïveté and the realism from developing into cynicism.” The Practice of Adaptive Leadership, Heifetz, Grashow and Linsky, p 297-298, 2009